Method E will shut out its season this weekend with its first go to to Seoul, South Korea. It is not simply the tip of season eight and the final race for the Gen2 electrical race automobiles but additionally marks the sequence’ a hundredth race. The game has come a good distance since its first ePrix in Beijing in 2014, with extra highly effective automobiles, larger batteries, and a capability to placed on an thrilling race at Monaco, one thing that Method 1 hasn’t been capable of say for a number of a long time .
Lucas at Grassi was the winner of that first ePrix and has raced in each ePrix since. He is nonetheless visiting victory lane, most lately in final Sunday’s London ePrix, and this weekend might rating his 1,000th profession level within the sequence. With a background in Method 1 after which Audi’s mighty R18 e-tron Le Mans program, at Grassi is aware of his method round a race automobile. So he is normally a very good individual to speak to in regards to the future course of the game.
Subsequent season the game will get a brand new automobile, one which’s far more highly effective—and lighter, too. Nevertheless it’s not fairly as daring, technology-wise, because the idea at Grassi lobbied for. Though that automobile has but to even race in anger, the assorted minds that contribute to Method E’s R&D street map are already excited about Gen4. Since we had the prospect to talk with the motive force forward of this week’s Seoul ePrix, I needed to know his ideas on the place the game ought to go subsequent. As I hoped, he had loads of them.
You’ve got been fairly outspoken prior to now about the place you suppose the technical course of the game ought to go, notably as street automobile EVs characteristic tech that has gone past what Method E permits. The place do you suppose Gen4 ought to go?
“That is a terrific query. For me, it is very clear from the start the place the know-how street map goes, not solely Method E, however all of the FIA [the organizing body for global motorsport], of the whole lot—for me, they have to be far more segmented when it comes to which options are higher for various sequence. Like, endurance racing needs to be specializing in car-relevant applied sciences. Method 1 ought to have essentially the most excessive power-to-weight ratio drivetrains. Then components E—essentially the most environment friendly engines ever. So for me, I might phase it far more and guarantee that the producers they wish to develop and make investments, do,” he instructed me.
“[The FIA] have a championship that may develop, and it might use a few of that experience to crossover to completely different sequence, however they do not overlap. And in the meanwhile, there may be loads of overlaps between endurance racing, Method 1, Method E. It is that the rules aren’t very clear. And I do not suppose there may be any person giving actually, actually clear instructions that is the best way these championships are going to evolve, and that is the know-how that really creates worth for the producer and for the followers and for the world in the long run. I feel in the meanwhile it isn’t a simple factor to do. And in the meanwhile, I do not consider the job is being accomplished in the suitable method,” di Grassi mentioned.